- LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT FULL
- LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT TRIAL
- LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT TV
- LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT FREE
The final vote was 228-206, with 13 Republicans joining Democrats in support of the bill. The measure includes some $550 billion in new spending that seeks to fund the construction of roads, bridges and highways, public transport, water infrastructure, as well as power and broadband infrastructure, and cyber security, among other initiatives. That appears to be the best way to keep the political/media lynch mob in check.Įditor’s note: To find out more about Diane Dimond, visit her website at Her latest book, “Thinking Outside the Crime and Justice Box,” is available on a day of negotiations, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill, sending it to President Joe Biden’s desk late Friday evening. Sandmann recently wrote an op-ed saying, “The corrupt liberal media came for me, just like they came for Kyle Rittenhouse, and if he decides to sue I say go for it and hold the media accountable.”
After out-of-court settlements he is now presumed to be a multimillionaire. Sandmann eventually sued seven media outlets for more than $800 million.
LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT FULL
The full video revealed Sandmann had done no such thing. Their videotaped faceoff was described by CNN, ABC, CBS, The Washington Post, The New York Times and others as a confrontation instigated by an obviously racist teen wearing a Make America Great Again Hat. In 2019, Nick Sandmann, a high school kid from Kentucky, was accused by several major news outlets of aggressively confronting a Native American man during demonstrations in Washington, D.C. Funny how some can so firmly embrace one constitutionally protected right - freedom of speech - and forget about another, namely, the right to self-defense.
LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT FREE
It’s a wonder Kenosha was able to seat an impartial jury.ĭefenders of the guilty media will likely mention free speech as part of their defense. This kid never had a chance in the tainted court of public opinion. Remember this when you hear Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg claim his platform doesn’t censor content.
Any post with the words “Free Kyle” was blocked. “We’ve designated the shooting in Kenosha a mass murder and are removing posts in support of the shooter,” Facebook said at the time. Facebook, that so-called beacon of free speech, blocked any posts sympathetic to Rittenhouse. And the false descriptions took on a tsunami quality on social media and in the public consciousness. Too many newspapers to mention in this limited space followed this erroneous storyline about Rittenhouse. Before the fatal shooting he had gone out to erase lewd graffiti spray-painted on a public building. He worked as a lifeguard and was a dedicated police cadet studying to be an EMT and a nurse. And as open-minded people learned during the trial, Kyle was none of the derogatory things the media claimed. The three older men, each with a violent criminal history, who attacked Rittenhouse that night were white, not black. The law said he was legally allowed to carry the rifle he had that night.įacts matter.
LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT TRIAL
Long before the trial facts emerged, MSNBC and CNN frequently repeated the theory that Rittenhouse acted as an “armed vigilante,” a “domestic terrorist” and “a racist.” Even after the verdict one MSNBC host called Rittenhouse “this little murderous white supremacist.” Sounds like slander to me.ĭespite media reports from CBS and others, Rittenhouse did not cross state lines “armed for battle.” (CBS, likely sensing legal liability, has now issued a correction.) Rittenhouse lived with his mother in nearby Antioch, Illinois but had a job, his father and many relatives living in Kenosha.
The camera also followed Rittenhouse after the shooting as he immediately tried to surrender to police. This despite readily available video showing the young man being chased, knocked down and violently attacked that fateful night.
LIBERAL CRIME SQUAD JUDGE CORRUPT TV
Many reporters and TV pundits pronounced Rittenhouse guilty from the get-go. Yes, politicians can be sued for slander for public statements made “outside their seat,” and it will be interesting to see if Rittenhouse’s team goes that route.īut it is media organizations that are the obvious prime targets for lawsuits. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., called Rittenhouse a “murderer who is once again walking free.” Cori Bush, D-Mo., took up the anti-Rittenhouse “white supremacy” chant, and even after the acquittal Rep. He ran a campaign ad condemning “white supremacists” featuring a photo of the then 17-year-old. Who is at risk of being sued? Politicians, including President Joe Biden, then a candidate without presidential immunity, was the first high-profile person to declare that young Kyle was a member of an Illinois militia.